LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Toyota Hiace 2018 2.5L Commuter M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
KWD 5646
KWD 8460
KWD 5427
KWD 8100
KWD 76
KWD 114
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.39
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.54
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.7
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.78
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 11.94
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.74
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 140.53
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 197.1
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
2
8 Seater
1230
/
14
/
4045
4715
1665
1800
1930
1985
2650
2985
2000
/
4.9m
/
2075 - 1495 - 1305
/
3.4m³
/
770
/
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
11.4
43
75
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
5-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Coil Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
165R14C
/
165R14C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Diesel
96.5
88 BHP
134
192
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
