Mustang Mach-E GT vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Price Comparison
KWD 19382
KWD 20727
KWD 18609
KWD 19934
KWD 261
KWD 279
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20
/
4712
4583 mm
1881
2008 mm
1597
1969 mm
2984
2587 mm
100+402
397 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
370
/
Safety
✓
/
Driver and Front-Passenger Dual-Stage, Driver Knee, Front-Seat Side-Impact, Rear-Seat Side-Impact, Side Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.5
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
B&O
/
Battery/Charging
Approx. 37 mins
/
150 kW
/
Approx. 14.0 hrs
/
10.5 kW
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
487
300 BHP
950
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Motor
✓
/
2
/
Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Whisper, Active, Untame, Untame Plus
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
