Okavango 2025 GF vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
KWD 9507
KWD 20803
KWD 9134
KWD 20015
KWD 128
KWD 280
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.5
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
19
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4860 mm
5115 mm
1910 mm
1980 mm
1770 mm
1920 mm
2825 mm
2890 mm
257 L
1004 L
194 mm
221 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
52 L
110 L
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
PVC Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
10
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
218
271 BHP
325 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
