Prado TXR 2.4T vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Price Comparison
KWD 17453
KWD 20727
KWD 16763
KWD 19934
KWD 235
KWD 279
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
191 km/h
4
4
2393 cc
/
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4925 mm
4583 mm
1980 mm
2008 mm
1925 mm
1969 mm
2850 mm
2587 mm
104 L
397 L
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
10.6 Km/L
10 Km/L
110 L
88 L
10.6 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
V
2.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
/
267 BHP
300 BHP
430 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
