T Roc 2025 R Line vs Nissan Pathfinder 2024 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 12475
KWD 14116
KWD 11971
KWD 13580
KWD 168
KWD 190
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 9.9
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
/
190
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4251
5046
1819
1975
1594
1795
2603
2900
445
470
Fuel Economy
15.8
9.4
50
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
8
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
271 BHP
250
340
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓