300 Conqueror 2.0T vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 12178
KWD 15296
KWD 11688
KWD 14677
KWD 164
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 17.05
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
6
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
8
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
5046
1930 mm
1975
1927 mm
1795
2750 mm
2900
400 L
470
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
9.4
75 L
74
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
271 BHP
387 Nm
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
