Ciciv SPORT vs ALTIMA SR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Price Comparison
KWD 8759
KWD 10165
KWD 8392
KWD 9725
KWD 118
KWD 137
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4900
1801
1852
1415
/
,735
2825
/
1440
/
19
/
4
Fuel Economy
47
61
/
16.4
Comfort
√
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
Driver Seat
/
5
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Sport Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
/
/
Dual Front Airbags Seat-mounted side-impact supplemental air bags for front- and rear-seat outboard occupants Roof-mounted curtain side-impact supplemental air bags with rollover sensor for front-and rear-seat outboard occupant head protection
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
8
6
√
/
/
8
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
Vented Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
188 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
/
5000
/
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
