Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs 3-Seater Panel Van L2H2 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
KWD 10029
KWD 9868
KWD 9642
KWD 9438
KWD 135
KWD 133
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
Dimensions
3
3
2155
1934kg
16
16
5265
5548
1950
/
1990
2499
3210
3682
3200
3.5T
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
10.8m³
1045
/
/
174
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
/
70
100
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Side Driver Airbag. Driver & Passenger Airbags.
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
7
✓
✓
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.3
Gasoline
Diesel
277
125
351
/
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
