HR-V SPORT vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 12406
KWD 15296
KWD 11928
KWD 14677
KWD 167
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
1498cc
/
/
190
Dimensions
5
8
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
5046
1790
1975
1590
1795
2610
2900
196
/
/
470
Fuel Economy
40
74
/
9.4
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
Front
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
√
✓
✓
/
✓
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
√
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
✓
√
✓
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
V6 9AT
4
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
271 BHP
87.7
/
6600
271 @ 6,400
145
340
4300
340 @ 4,800
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
