T Roc R-Line vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 12552
KWD 15296
KWD 12057
KWD 14677
KWD 169
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.33
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 2.31
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 10.23
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 120.45
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
/
190
Dimensions
5
8
18
/
4251
5046
1819
1975
1594
1795
2603
2900
445
470
Fuel Economy
15.8
9.4
50
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Curtain Airbag System For Front And Rear Passengers Incl. Side Airbags In Front.
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
271 BHP
250
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
