T2 Luxury vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 12771
KWD 15296
KWD 12252
KWD 14677
KWD 172
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
190
4
6
/
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
8
1880
/
20
/
5 Doors
/
4785
5046
2006
1975
1880
1795
2800
2900
/
470
220 mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.4
/
74
/
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Rear Electronic Limited Slip Differential
/
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Real time 4WD
/
Limited-Slip Differential
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
255/55R20
/
255/55R20
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
/
/
/
/
380 BHP
271 BHP
/
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
✓
Sports, Economy, Standard, Snow, Sediment, Rock, X Smart Mode
/
Auto
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
