T2 Standard vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 12697
KWD 15296
KWD 12185
KWD 14677
KWD 171
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.5
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.47
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 15.35
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 180.68
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
190
4
6
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
8
5 Doors
/
4785 mm
5046
2006 mm
1975
1880 mm
1795
2800 mm
2900
752 L
470
220 mm
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
9.4
70 L
74
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
250 BHP
271 BHP
390 Nm
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓