Tahoe RST vs Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Price Comparison
KWD 26375
KWD 18120
KWD 25375
KWD 17396
KWD 355
KWD 244
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.55
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.77
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.85
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 5.39
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 16.5
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 23.1
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 200.75
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 281.05
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
/
6
/
3600 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
22
/
5 Doors
4 Doors
5181
4785 mm
2053
1877 mm
1925
1801 mm
3071
3007 mm
3479
487 L
/
246 m
Fuel Economy
9.7
7 Km/L
100
87 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.2
/
Jet Black/Victory Red perforated leather seating
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
9
9
BOSE
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
AT
/
10
/
10AT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6.2 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
420 BHP
285 BHP
624
352 Nm
/
V
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
