ZR-V EX vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 11211
KWD 15296
KWD 10752
KWD 14677
KWD 151
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
/
190
Dimensions
5
8
1488
/
18 英寸
/
4567
5046
1840
1975
1621
1795
2657
2900
380
470
186
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.4
/
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
√
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
√
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
麦弗逊式独立悬挂
/
多连杆式独立悬挂
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
✓
√
✓
225/55 R18
/
225/55 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
V6 9AT
有
/
4
/
180
271 BHP
132.4
/
6000
271 @ 6,400
240
340
1700-4500
340 @ 4,800
直喷
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
