300 Conqueror vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 13592
KWD 15296
KWD 13060
KWD 14677
KWD 183
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.44
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 3.08
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 13.64
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.76
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 160.6
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
6
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
8
5 Doors
/
4760
5046
1930
1975
1927
1795
2750
2900
400 L
470
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
9.4
75 L
74
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
271 BHP
387 Nm
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
