CarteaCompare Cars300 Conqueror vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

300 Conqueror vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Outstanding off-road performance
  • Outstanding engine power
  • Spacious and luxurious interior design

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Slow electronic system response

Price Comparison

KWD 13592

TBD

KWD 13060

TBD

KWD 183

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

KWD 0.44

Daily Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

KWD 3.08

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

KWD 13.64

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

KWD 160.6

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

240 km/h

4

6

1998 cc

3492 cc

Chinese

Japanese

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4760

5350 mm

1930

2030 mm

1927

1955 mm

2750

3075 mm

400 L

836 L

224

253 m

Fuel Economy

12.1

/

75 L

97 L

10 Km/L

7.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Dual Zone

/

/

Electric

Electric

/

Standard

Standard

/

/

Safety

Infotainment

12.3

14.3

/

Android LCD

Android LCD

9

12

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R17

/

265/65 R17

/

Exterior

/

/

LED

LED

/

/

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Twin Turbo

4

4

224 BHP

425 BHP

387 Nm

700 Nm

Technologies

Popular Car Comparisons

Tank | 300 Conqueror

VS

Infiniti | Infiniti QX50 2024 2.0T Luxe (FWD)

Tank | 300 Conqueror

VS

Deepal | S09 RWD

Tank | 300 Conqueror

VS

GAC | Hyptec HT Premium

Tank | 300 Conqueror

VS

Toyota | FORTUNER VX2 4X4

Tank | 300 Conqueror

VS

Nissan | Nissan Pathfinder 2024 3.5L S 4WD

Tank Related Car

Nissan Related Car

Nissan Related Used Car