Geometry C 2025 vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
KWD 11508
KWD 15296
KWD 11039
KWD 14677
KWD 155
KWD 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
KWD 0.61
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
KWD 4.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
KWD 18.15
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
KWD 220.83
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
6
Dimensions
5
8
4432
5046
1833
1975
1560
1795
2700
2900
140
/
/
470
Fuel Economy
/
9.4
/
74
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
3.5 L
Electric
Gasoline
201
271 BHP
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
